<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Abstract Sequential?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephaniehobson.ca/wordpress/2009/11/12/why-abstract-sequential/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephaniehobson.ca/wordpress/2009/11/12/why-abstract-sequential/</link>
	<description>You make it pretty - I make it work.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 02:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://stephaniehobson.ca/wordpress/2009/11/12/why-abstract-sequential/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniehobson.ca/wordpress/?p=104#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>Sounds like it&#039;s safe to say you&#039;re random... Other than that I would err on the side of concrete random because of your penchant for distance learning and your unwillingness to accept anything on outside authority ;) But if it&#039;s that close you can probably stick to the recommended learning methods of either style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like it&#8217;s safe to say you&#8217;re random&#8230; Other than that I would err on the side of concrete random because of your penchant for distance learning and your unwillingness to accept anything on outside authority ;) But if it&#8217;s that close you can probably stick to the recommended learning methods of either style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenzie</title>
		<link>http://stephaniehobson.ca/wordpress/2009/11/12/why-abstract-sequential/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniehobson.ca/wordpress/?p=104#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>Okay, the results are in and....

Well, one thing is for sure. I don&#039;t seem to be Concrete Sequential. At all. Okay, a smidge, with a score of 2.

But with a score of 10 the winner is Concrete Random.
But since Abstract Sequential and Abstract Random both have a score of 9, I&#039;m not sure that this result is conclusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, the results are in and&#8230;.</p>
<p>Well, one thing is for sure. I don&#8217;t seem to be Concrete Sequential. At all. Okay, a smidge, with a score of 2.</p>
<p>But with a score of 10 the winner is Concrete Random.<br />
But since Abstract Sequential and Abstract Random both have a score of 9, I&#8217;m not sure that this result is conclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenzie</title>
		<link>http://stephaniehobson.ca/wordpress/2009/11/12/why-abstract-sequential/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephaniehobson.ca/wordpress/?p=104#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>I think maybe that should be abstract random at the beginning of the list of the other three? 

I&#039;m gonna go and see if my supposition about myself - abstract random - is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think maybe that should be abstract random at the beginning of the list of the other three? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna go and see if my supposition about myself &#8211; abstract random &#8211; is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
